Dew forms at a theoretical maximum of approximately 0.08 mm h-1 with a normal nightly accumulation of 0.3 to 0.5 mm (Garratt & Segal, 1988). Of the dew formed approximately 33 percent is due to plant exudates or guttation as measured on a creeping bentgrass golf course fairway (Williams, et. al., 1998). Dew once removed early in the morning can re-accumulate with a higher proportion, 46 to 77% comprised of plant exudates.
Agronomically dew is important both positively and negatively. The presence of dew often is a sign of whether a turf needs water or not. If dew is present, generally there is moisture present in the soil. However, if turf situations where dew is absent, this may be an indicator inadequate soil moisture is present, and watering during the day may be required.
Negatively dew and, associated wetting periods have been reported to influence disease severity. The duration of how long a leaf is wet, referred to as the wetting period, has influenced the severity of anthracnose (Danneberger, 1984). Regarding dollar spot, reducing the dew period through early morning poling or mowing has reduced dollar spot severity (Williams, 1996). Although early morning mowing increases the potential of wounding and thus more infection points, no difference in dollar spot specifically between mowing in the evening versus the morning (Williams, 1996). It appears that the reduction in the duration of the dew period from an early morning mowing is more significant than the wounding that might occur.
However, the impact of re-accumulation of dew following mowing or poling could be a factor in disease development due to the larger proportion of the dew being comprised of guttation water. The increased proportion of guttation water following initial removal can be qualitatively determined by striking a golf ball across a putting green following mowing or whipping. The ball picks up moisture and if allowed to try feels “sticky”. The stickiness is due to the sugar from the guttation water. Often overlooked by golf course superintendents, early morning golfers often attribute this stickiness to application of fertilizers or pesticides.
Danneberger, T.K., J.M. Vargas, Jr., and A.L. Jones. 1984. A model for weather-based forecasting of anthracnose on annual bluegrass. Phytopathology 74:448-451.
Garratt, J.R. and M. Segal. 1988. On the contribution of atmospheric moisture to dew formation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 45, 209-236.
Williams, D.W., A.J. Powell, Jr., C.T. Dougherty, and P. Vincelli. 1998. Separation and quantification of the sources of dew on creeping bentgrass. Crop Science 38, 1613-1617.
Williams, D.W., A.J. Powell, Jr., P. Vincelli, and C.T. Dougherty. 1996. Dollar spot on bentgrass influeced by displacement of leaf surface moisture, nitrogen, and clipping removal. Crop Science 36, 1304-1309.